home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!factory!ray.normandeau
- From: ray.normandeau@factory.com (Ray Normandeau)
- Newsgroups: misc.consumers
- Subject: DISPUTE OVER A BILL WITH
- Message-ID: <12027.2546.uupcb@factory.com>
- Date: 6 Jan 93 23:36:00 GMT
- Distribution: world
- Organization: Invention Factory's BBS - New York City, NY - 212-274-8298v.32bis
- Reply-To: ray.normandeau@factory.com (Ray Normandeau)
- Lines: 16
-
- -> The $40 are not a big deal to me but I am seriously considering not
- -> paying it. However, I would like to know if I am legally bound to an
- -> agreement that I thought I had broken by NOT renewing my
- -> subscription. Obviously, the San Francisco Examiner has lawyers
- -> working for them that had some say when they decided on this
- -> marketing
- -> strategy.
-
-
- Did you at any time sign anything that indicated that you were
- automatically authorizing renewels? How about verbally?
-
- I would complain about this deceptive trade practice to the Attorney
- General of your state in a letter with copies to the newspaper and it
- competitors showing at bottom who is getting the copies.
-
-