home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!isc-br!frigg!carlp
- From: carlp@frigg.isc-br.com (Carl Paukstis)
- Newsgroups: misc.consumers
- Subject: Re: Just a Question
- Message-ID: <carlp.726351024@frigg>
- Date: 6 Jan 93 20:10:24 GMT
- References: <1993Jan5.174930.1348@merlin.dev.cdx.mot.com> <1993Jan5.212124.21005@erenj.com> <1993Jan5.212328.21076@erenj.com> <1993Jan6.004147.18753@netcom.com> <1993Jan6.135302.25885@nynexst.com>
- Sender: news@isc-br.isc-br.com (news user)
- Organization: ISC-Bunker Ramo, An Olivetti Company
- Lines: 51
- Nntp-Posting-Host: frigg.isc-br.com
-
- schwartz@nynexst.com (Steven Schwartz) writes:
-
- >On the news this morning: Second-hand cigarette smoke has been
- >"officially" classified as hazardous, in the same category as
- >asbestos.
-
- A political rather than scientific decision, as with ALL other effects
- of the War on (Some) Drugs. Remember the test strategy for Saccharin?
- Feed rats the equuivalent of a human drinking mumble-hundred diet
- colas a day for 30 years, and 10% of them get cancer. Similar with
- secondhand smoke. While it certainly is annoying, even to me (a
- smoker), the only likely sufferers of health effects are children of
- smoking parents or other folks with similar intense, prolonged (years)
- exposure.
-
- Go ahead, flame away - health Nazis give me the retching vomits.
-
- Folks, this is a _social_ problem - and the effect of federal or state
- government trying to "solve" social problems (let alone economic ones)
- is nearly always expensive, ineffective, and detrimental to the civil
- rights of ALL citizens.
-
- A little courtesy on both sides could have stopped this smoking war
- years ago; now we see all kinds of Gummint regulation getting into the
- action, certain to make things worse.
-
- >I'd like to see these cig. taxes going towards health programs,
- >seeing as how the govt finally recognized 2H smoke for what it is.
-
- Please disabuse yourself of the notion that any particular tax goes
- toward any particular program. Maybe one day there was accounting
- like this. Now, everything goes into one big pot, and everything's
- paid out of it. Sometimes they check to see whether there's enough
- funding in the budget to cover the taxes allegedly collected for
- specific purpose (e.g. fuels tax for raod programs), but more often
- it's just whisked away and we never know what hit us.
-
- At the State level, this is even worse. Assorted states have raided
- the fund collected from motorcycle endorsement fees and "dedicated" to
- rider education programs - IL, for example, cut back and may close
- down rider education, despite the fact that this "fund" MORE than
- covered the necessary expenditures.
-
- Or look into the ammunition tax, purported to pay for wildlife
- conservation for sport hunting. Almost all blown on the defecit.
-
- --
- Carl Paukstis, RRR&RSG |"The good news is that Clinton will have to
- Olivetti North America/Spokane,WA | work hard to do worse than Bush in terms
- Phone: +1 509 927-5439 | of economic policy. The bad news is that
- Mail: carlp@mail.spk.olivetti.com | he will probably manage to do so"-Ed Ipser
-