home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky gnu.misc.discuss:4330 talk.philosophy.misc:3230 misc.legal:22240
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!ai-lab!hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu!mycroft
- From: mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum)
- Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,talk.philosophy.misc,misc.legal
- Subject: Re: Fund raising at the FSF
- Date: 8 Jan 1993 22:14:23 GMT
- Organization: /etc/organization
- Lines: 16
- Message-ID: <1ikubvINNfqe@life.ai.mit.edu>
- References: <1993Jan7.202709.19083@husc3.harvard.edu> <1iindhINNfu5@agate.berkeley.edu> <1993Jan8.212814.21601@blaze.cs.jhu.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu
-
-
- In article <1993Jan8.212814.21601@blaze.cs.jhu.edu>
- arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee) writes:
- >
- > How are you going to prove you took the code from a common (non-GPL)
- > source, instead of copying from the GPL to the non-GPL program?
-
- It doesn't matter. If you own the original GPL'd source, you can put
- whatever license on it you wish. The GPL itself does not transfer
- ownership, and it does not magically transcend copyright law. It
- cannot do either.
-
- --
- \ / Charles Hannum, mycroft@ai.mit.edu
- /\ \ PGP public key available on request. MIME, AMS, NextMail accepted.
- Scheme White heterosexual atheist male (WHAM) pride!
-