home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew
- From: mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk>
- Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,
- Subject: Re: Fund raising at the FSF
- Message-ID: <88PywB28w165w@mantis.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jan 93 15:58:30 GMT
- References: <1993Jan6.001218.26182@mcnc.org>
- Distribution: world
- Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.
- Lines: 17
-
- fgray@cardinal.ncsc.org (Frederick E Gray) writes:
- > In <1993Jan5.022956.19008@husc3.harvard.edu>, <zeleny@husc10.harvard.edu> (Mi
- > >Nonsense. What I am saying is that I am not free to use GNU in any way
- > >I see fit; more importantly, nor am I free of legal obligation implicit
- > >in, and specific to its use. Consequently, it is not free. Is this so
- > >hard to understand?
- >
- > It is ridiculous to claim that a "freedom" must entail no obligations.
-
- True in general. But in this specific case, it is demonstrably true that
- software *can* be free with no obligations.
-
- One Fallacy of Accident shot down. Next?
-
-
- mathew
-
-