home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #1 / NN_1993_1.iso / spool / comp / unix / sys5 / r4 / 1184 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-09  |  1.1 KB
  1. Xref: sparky comp.unix.sys5.r4:1184 comp.unix.questions:15356 biz.comp.telebit.netblazer:24 comp.protocols.tcp-ip:5887
  2. Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.r4,comp.unix.questions,biz.comp.telebit.netblazer,comp.protocols.tcp-ip
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!nucsrl!ddsw1!karl
  4. From: karl@ddsw1.mcs.com (Karl Denninger)
  5. Subject: Re: Netblazer
  6. Message-ID: <C0KKq4.1uI@ddsw1.mcs.com>
  7. Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 04:34:51 GMT
  8. References: <1993Jan07.224637.4538@xenitec.on.ca> <C0JFMF.4nu@ddsw1.mcs.com> <C0JL58.HqK@news.rn.com>
  9. Organization: MCSNet, Chicago, IL
  10. Lines: 15
  11.  
  12. In article <C0JL58.HqK@news.rn.com> larry@news.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
  13. >Would VJ compression with SLIP be benificial even if you
  14. >have hardware compression (v.42bis?).  If so, how much?
  15. >
  16. >Just wondering --
  17.  
  18. Yes.  Without VJ compression interactive sessions on SLIP or PPP connections
  19. at dial speeds are painfully slow, even with V.42bis on the modems.
  20.  
  21. They are quite complimentary.
  22.  
  23. --
  24. Karl Denninger (karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM, <well-connected>!ddsw1!karl)
  25. Data Line: [+1 312 248-0900]
  26.  
  27.