home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!noao!amethyst!organpipe.uug.arizona.edu!jahnke.biosci.arizona.edu!user
- From: jahnke@biosci.arizona.edu (Jerome Jahnke)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
- Subject: Re: Stallman and friends
- Message-ID: <jahnke-060193154148@jahnke.biosci.arizona.edu>
- Date: 6 Jan 93 22:44:07 GMT
- References: <D2150035.mrrnh5@outpost.SF-Bay.org> <1993Jan5.213038.2088@netcom.com> <1993Jan6.142339.28227@kth.se>
- Sender: news@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu
- Followup-To: comp.sys.mac.programmer,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools,comp.windows.ms.programmer
- Organization: University of Arizona
- Lines: 54
-
- In article <1993Jan6.142339.28227@kth.se>, d88-jwa@dront.nada.kth.se (Jon
- Wtte) wrote:
- >
- > In <1993Jan5.213038.2088@netcom.com> jimlynch@netcom.com (Jim Lynch) writes:
- >
- > >How fo you feel about software patents? If you're threatened by ideas that
- > >the FSF espouse, such as my right to write anything I damn well please, I
- > >hereby threaten you. How do you like me now?
- >
- > Well, I have mixed feelings.
- >
- > 1) If I cook up something on my own and code it, I should be free
- > from liability
- > 2) If someone diassembles that something and uses the algorithm,
- > he should not be free from liability
- >
- > Maybe a limited kind of patent that lasts for say 5 years, like
- > they have in the medical business (only there it's 2 years)
-
- 5 YEARS??????? I think that this is still a bit on the long side. How many
- people out there use programs that were developed 5 years ago? I know we
- may all use algorithms developed that long ago. Would favor a 2 year with
- an option to renew for additional years. This would get info out to folks
- much faster and still allow a developer to collect for a good idea, or even
- establish a prominet market position.
-
- > And software lends itself to licensing readily; you could imagine
- > a global ftp site with patented algorithm example implementations
- > for study & use, coupled with the address to obtain licensing...
-
- I too feel that the support and distribution mechanism for software needs
- to be reworked. Software is not a manufacturing industry. Which is why you
- can have all the moralizing about software piracy. The software industry is
- on the forefront of the information economy, and new techniques need to be
- developed for dealing with it. Shareware is rapidly becoming that however
- (no manufacturing at all) but it is a shame that there is no way to enforce
- payment of shareware. I wonder if the SPA sues for illegal copies of
- shareware on machines when they do raids. Or do they just protect
- commercial companies?
-
- > Cheers,
- >
- > / h+
- > --
- > -- Jon W{tte, h+@nada.kth.se, Mac Hacker Deluxe --
- >
- > Cookie Jar: Vanilla Yoghurt with Crushed Oreos.
-
- Jer,
- ----
- Jerome Jahnke
- Biology Learning Center
- University of Arizona
- jahnke@biosci.arizona.edu or +1 (602) 621-3820
-