home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!kronos.arc.nasa.gov!butch!enterprise!news
- From: fw_adams@LMSC.Lockheed.com (Frank Adams)
- Subject: Re: Any major bugs in Word 5.1????
- Message-ID: <fw_adams-120193165627@129.197.140.143>
- Followup-To: comp.sys.mac.apps
- Sender: news@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: 129.197.140.143
- Organization: Lockheed R&DD
- References: <stevens-080193101915@voodoo.cs.colorado.edu>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 93 01:36:30 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <stevens-080193101915@voodoo.cs.colorado.edu>,
- stevens@cs.colorado.edu (Curt Stevens) wrote:
- >
- > I am considering the Word 5.1a upgrade (from 5.0a). Is there any reason NOT
- > to get this upgrade? The cost is not really the issue for me. I am
- > wondering if any of my old documents will "break" or if MS introduced any
- > major bugs or other types of "brain damage" that didn't already exist in
- > 5.0.
-
- I have been using Word 5.1a for about a week, and have noticed one feature
- that broke, though it had worked in Word 5.0. I have an article stored in
- two files which I set up as a file sequence, with the page numbers of the
- second file continuing in sequence from the last page of the first file.
- Word 5.0 did this correctly both in printing and in table-of-contents
- generation. After I changed to 5.1a, table-of-contents entries for the
- second file started over at page 1. I could only get what I wanted by
- manually specifying the starting page of the second file. I did not check
- whether the same error occurs when printing.
-
- Frank Adams, fw_adams@LMSC.Lockheed.com
-