home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!news.cs.brandeis.edu!cs.brandeis.edu!richard
- From: richard@cs.brandeis.edu (Richard Congdon)
- Subject: Re: clusters
- Message-ID: <1993Jan6.140908.23614@news.cs.brandeis.edu>
- Keywords: cluster
- Sender: news@news.cs.brandeis.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Brandeis University Computer Science
- References: <BzFsCM.H5u@bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au> <42692@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> <28226@dog.ee.lbl.gov>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 14:09:08 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <28226@dog.ee.lbl.gov>, mario@cad4.lbl.gov (mario aranha) writes:
- |> We have ~15 300/400's and ~10 700s. Any significant comments on
- |> making a mixed-cluster out of these?
-
- Be careful about OS release number. 9.0 won't do machines with 68020's,
- and 10.0 won't do 68030's (or is it all Motorola chips?)
-
- |>
- |> Was told HP plans to replace clusters with NFS in the near future.
- |> Is this true?
-
- I thought I had heard somewhere that HP's clustered environment was on
- the way out. I have no idea when this would happen, though. If true, it
- is very disappointing.
-
- --
- Richard Congdon
- Brandeis University Computer Science
- 617/736-2717
-