home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!charnel!rat!ucselx!crash!uzun
- From: uzun@crash.cts.com (Roger Uzun)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.cdc
- Subject: Re: Cyber Speeds
- Message-ID: <1993Jan08.164828.2654@crash>
- Date: 9 Jan 93 00:48:28 GMT
- References: <1993Jan07.115610.21080@crash> <martineau-080193081105@macmartineau.ccr.hydro.qc.ca>
- Organization: CTS Network Services (crash, ctsnet), El Cajon, CA
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <martineau-080193081105@macmartineau.ccr.hydro.qc.ca> martineau@MacMartineau.ccr.hydro.qc.ca (Alain Martineau) writes:
- >
- >Here is what I found:
- >CDC Cyber 2000V 32 Mflops
- >CDC Cyber 205(4-pipe) 17 Mflops
- >CDC Cyber 205(2-pipe) 17 Mflops
- >CDC Cyber 990E 12 Mflops
- >CDC Cyber 4680 9.4 Mflops
- >CDC Cyber 875 4.8 Mflops
- >CDC Cyber 176 4.6 Mflops
- >CDC Cyber 760 2.6 Mflops
- >CDC Cyber 175 2.1 Mflops
- >CDC Cyber 180-860 2.1 Mflops
- >
- >The first 486 listed is
- >Compaq Deskpro 486/331-120w/487 1.4 Mflops
- Thanks for the numbers.
- I have linpack and have run it on my Amiga 4000 (68040/25) it gives me
- 1.24 MFlops. Which is fine for Floating Point, but I wonder how
- the Integer performance of a Cyber vs an 040/486 is.
-
- -Roger
- --------------------------------------------------------------
- bix: ruzun
- NET: uzun@crash.cts.com
-