home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!Sirius.dfn.de!rrz.uni-koeln.de!unidui!uniol!caty!cbmger!imart.franken.de!incubus.sub.org!heap!michael
- From: michael@heap.incubus.sub.org (Michael Herold)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: Arexx question
- Message-ID: <HTsgs*kb0@heap.incubus.sub.org>
- Date: 8 Jan 93 22:23:23 GMT
- References: <1993Jan7.071959.4572@sol.UVic.CA>
- Reply-To: michael@heap.incubus.sub.org
- Organization: None
- Lines: 18
- X-Newsreader: Arn V1.00
-
- In article <1993Jan7.071959.4572@sol.UVic.CA>, Aaron Ramsey writes:
-
- >I have a simple question about Arexx... I want for my Arexx program to
- >sit and wait for say 3 minutes or so, and then continue on with the program.
- >How do I get ARexx to do that without~r using up much processor time?
- >The loop that I tried didn't work too hot. 8-) There must be a command
- >that does this??? Anybody? Thanks.
-
- You *can* use the function DELAY() in the rexxsupport.library. DELAY(Tick)
- puts then process for Ticks/50 seconds in the waitstate, but this routine
- isn't suitable for *exact* timeloops.
- ,,,
- (o o)
- +------------------+------------------------oOO--(_)--OOo---+
- | Michael Herold | |
- | Tel: 0931-781948 | UUCP : michael@heap.incubus.sub.org |
- | West-Germany | ZNET : michael%heap.incubus@aworld.zer |
- +------------------+----------------------------------------+
-