home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!gatech!hubcap!charlet
- From: charlet@hubcap.clemson.edu (Charles E "Rick" Taylor IV)
- Subject: Re: Prowrite vs. Final Copy II
- Message-ID: <1993Jan7.193530.23755@hubcap.clemson.edu>
- Organization: Clemson University
- References: <C0E7Cs.7p3@csugrad.cs.vt.edu> <C0HuuB.96A@srgenprp.sr.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 19:35:30 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- kevint@sad.hp.com (Kevin Taddeucci) writes:
-
- >Jake Rose (jaker@csugrad.cs.vt.edu) wrote:
-
- >Actually, in 640 X 400 or higher resolution, Final copy is one of the best
- >looking (as far as interface) word processors I have seen. I like the
- >interface in Final Copy II as well.
-
- If the screen is flickerfixed or not interlaced, yes. I look forward to
- trying FC1.3 (and later FC II) on a 1200 when mine gets here. The faster
- processor should make printing speed more acceptable as well (on a 500
- 1 meg chip/4 megs fast it's *painfully* slow, which is why I use ProWrite
- at present with it's NLQ option.)
-
- >Back to the point of the original post. In my opinion Final Copy's print
- >output certainly looks better than any other Amiga word processor and
- >looks as good as anything I have seen from any Graphics MS-DOS word
- >processor.
-
- The only "bad thing" about FC II is that it lacks a few very useful features
- like UNDO!
-
- --
- + Rick __ + EMAIL:charlet@hubcap.clemson.edu + //\ + /|\ It's +
- | /aylor | IRC : Tomalek / The Romulan | \X/--\miga 500 | J rainy |
- +-------------+----------------------------------+----------------+----------+
- + "Every Girl Already Has A Boyfriend" --- Murphy's Law Of Dating... +
-