home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!vnet.ibm.com
- From: buckler@vnet.ibm.com (Jason Buckler)
- Message-ID: <19930105.084643.590@almaden.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 93 11:42:43 EST
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Subject: Re: Opinion: What IBM should change in OS/2
- News-Software: UReply 3.1
- References: <TeFqwB4w165w@iowegia.uucp> <1i9ob9INN4i@hpscit.sc.hp.com> <19930104.100300.334@almaden.ibm.com>
- <OLAVT.93Jan5155508@ulrik.uio.no>
- Lines: 20
-
- In <OLAVT.93Jan5155508@ulrik.uio.no> Olav Torvund writes:
- >In article <19930104.100300.334@almaden.ibm.com> buckler@vnet.ibm.com (Jason Buckler) writes:
- >
- > I'm one of those folx who, upon any startup, turns off the numlock - I never
- > use it. Hate it, matter of fact. I never have figured out why it gets
- > turned on in the first place.
- >
- >And I am one of those who always turns Num Lock on. I have never
- >figured out why it is turned off in the first place. The answer is
- >simple: Let the user decide. Let us have one global setting under
- >installation, and a possibility to set it individually for each
- >program session.
-
- I'm in agreeance with that - some apps, though turn it on all by themselves
- (most calculator apps, for instance). Shouldn't be too hard to add that
- option to say, system settings. I think it's even been suggested, though
- I'm not sure.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------
- Jason Buckler | Disclaimer: These are my opinions,
- buckler@vnet.ibm.com | not those of IBM.
-