home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!aun.uninett.no!nuug!nntp.uio.no!olavt
- From: olavt@ulrik.uio.no (Olav Torvund)
- Subject: Re: Opinion: What IBM should change in OS/2
- In-Reply-To: buckler@vnet.ibm.com's message of Mon, 4 Jan 93 12:57:25 EST
- Message-ID: <OLAVT.93Jan5155508@ulrik.uio.no>
- Sender: news@ulrik.uio.no (Mr News)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ulrik
- Organization: University of Oslo, Norway
- References: <TeFqwB4w165w@iowegia.uucp> <1i9ob9INN4i@hpscit.sc.hp.com>
- <19930104.100300.334@almaden.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 14:55:08 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <19930104.100300.334@almaden.ibm.com> buckler@vnet.ibm.com (Jason Buckler) writes:
-
- >: Actually the only thing I want is an OS/2 that doesn't turn off the
- >: NUM-LOCK.
- >:
- >I'm even willing for it to be an easy-to-set option since there are
- probably
- >still people who prefer it off.
- >
-
- I'm one of those folx who, upon any startup, turns off the numlock - I never
- use it. Hate it, matter of fact. I never have figured out why it gets
- turned on in the first place.
-
- And I am one of those who always turns Num Lock on. I have never
- figured out why it is turned off in the first place. The answer is
- simple: Let the user decide. Let us have one global setting under
- installation, and a possibility to set it individually for each
- program session.
-
- Olav Torvund
- University of Oslo
- Norway
- Olavt@jus.uio.no
-
-