home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!gatech!rutgers!cmcl2!panix!os2man
- From: os2man@panix.com (Larry Salomon Jr.)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Subject: Re: Opinion: What IBM should change in OS/2
- Message-ID: <C0DuLH.2n2@panix.com>
- Date: 5 Jan 93 13:24:53 GMT
- References: <TeFqwB4w165w@iowegia.uucp> <1i9ob9INN4i@hpscit.sc.hp.com> <sheldon.726171217@pv141b.vincent.iastate.edu>
- Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix, NYC
- Lines: 23
-
- In <sheldon.726171217@pv141b.vincent.iastate.edu> sheldon@iastate.edu (Steve Sheldon) writes:
-
- >In <1i9ob9INN4i@hpscit.sc.hp.com> kitchin@lf.hp.com (Bruce Kitchin) writes:
-
- >>: Actually the only thing I want is an OS/2 that doesn't turn off the
- >>: NUM-LOCK.
- >>:
- >>I'm even willing for it to be an easy-to-set option since there are probably
- >>still people who prefer it off.
-
- > I'd like it to stop messing with it entirely and leave it the way I set it.
- >I've noticed that depending on what window I focus on, the Numlock changes.
-
- You should also notice that this happens with the Caps Lock and Scroll Lock
- keys. OS/2 saves the state of these keys whenever you switch to another
- application and restores them when you return.
-
- Cheers,
- Q
- --
- "If you choose not to decide, you | "My other body is in the shop" - seen
- still have made a choice" - Rush | on a T-shirt
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-