home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rphroy!max.ct.gmr.com
- From: rbotimer@max.ct.gmr.com (R Douglas Botimer)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
- Subject: Re: Does QPro4W work with 2.1 beta?
- Keywords: QPW 2.1 BETA
- Message-ID: <95989@rphroy.ph.gmr.com>
- Date: 5 Jan 93 14:05:41 GMT
- References: <17779@umd5.umd.edu>
- Sender: news@rphroy.ph.gmr.com
- Lines: 19
- Nntp-Posting-Host: max.ct.gmr.com
-
- In article <17779@umd5.umd.edu> brianw@macbeth.umd.edu (Brian Wiersema) writes:
- :In article <11553@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> king@cs.uq.oz.au writes:
- :>Does Borlands Quatro-Pro for Windows work with the 2.1 beta?
- :>I have neither, but will likely get both if they work together.
- :>I seem to recall that with the SP installed, people were
- :>able to tweak a few settings and get most but not all of it working.
- :
- :I haven't had any trouble with it under GA+CSD. Just set DPMI to a
- :reasonably decent value (mine's 10MB). I haven't tried it with the
- :2.1 beta, but I assume it, too, will work just fine (for a Windows
- :program, that is). Hey Borland! How about Quattro Pro for OS/2?!
-
- Tried QPW and DBD with the 2.1 BETA last night and everything worked fine.
- Seamless Windows was smooth and relatively fast (on a 386SX/25). The DBD works
- fine, it didn't with GA+SP on my systems.
-
- Ditto on the QPOS/2!!
-
- Doug
-