home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uchinews!quads!soh3
- From: soh3@quads.uchicago.edu (min-woong sohn)
- Subject: Re: NT Destined to Succeed??
- Message-ID: <1993Jan5.040741.27996@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
- Reply-To: soh3@midway.uchicago.edu
- Organization: Dept. of Sociology, Univ. of Chicago
- References: <1993Jan3.205457.17495@wam.umd.edu> <1993Jan4.111435.685@actrix.gen.nz> <1993Jan04.184825.3260@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 04:07:41 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- In article <1993Jan04.184825.3260@microsoft.com> philipla@microsoft.com (Phil Lafornara) writes:
-
- > I don't think you're a liar. I do think that your attempts to
- >generalize your personal experience with Windows NT to sweeping
- >statements about Windows NT as a whole are FUD, and I've told you
- >why.
-
- I don't remember Steve trying to make any sweeping statements about
- NT. Part of what he said was with slightly less than 8 megs of memory,
- NT refused to boot and with 8 megs he managed to boot up NT but its
- performance was too bad. I don't find any FUD in these lines. Because
- his observations were so in direct contradiction to some of the posts
- from NT advocates including Brian Sturgill, I found his experiment
- very interesting. It was not definitely a FUD. Is reporting personal
- experiences spreading FUD?
-
- >>You refuse to believe anything bad about NT and ignore it. Then, since all
- >>the bad things have been ruled out of order.....NT must be great!
- >
- > Let me say this: My own personal experiences with Windows NT
- >are in direct conflict with the reports that you've published here.
- >I've been running it for months with no major problems.
-
- Tell us about your configuration and let's see what's the difference.
- I hope it has more than 16 megs of memory:)
-
- Min
-
-