home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!mama!andy
- From: andy@research.canon.oz.au (Andy Newman)
- Subject: Re: More Windows NT
- Message-ID: <C06HKy.4qI@research.canon.oz.au>
- Sender: news@research.canon.oz.au
- Organization: Canon Information Systems Research Australia
- References: <1992Dec31.055712.627@netcom.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 14:00:34 GMT
- Lines: 12
-
- esprit@netcom.com (Alan F. Perry) writes:
- >Is Microsoft going to user(for lack of a better term)-written servers
- >or publish the interface between the servers and the NT executive. Is
- >the interface well-defined or was it determined in an ad-hoc fashion
- >that arose as Microsft implemented their servers?
-
- I and several others posted this question to one of the comp.sys.windows
- groups frequented by Microsoft staffers. No answer was forthcoming. It
- would be nice to get at the kernel, seems quite reasonable underneath.
-
- --
- Andy Newman (andy@research.canon.oz.au)
-