home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!ns1.nodak.edu!plains.NoDak.edu!jnelson
- From: jnelson@plains.NoDak.edu (Jim Nelson)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Subject: Re: Annoying Linux developer habits.
- Message-ID: <C0rwBw.Epu@ns1.nodak.edu>
- Date: 13 Jan 93 03:28:44 GMT
- Article-I.D.: ns1.C0rwBw.Epu
- References: <C0LFHK.F2E@ais.org> <1993Jan11.154103.24261@bernina.ethz.ch>
- Sender: usenet@ns1.nodak.edu (News login)
- Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network
- Lines: 21
- Nntp-Posting-Host: plains.nodak.edu
-
- In article <1993Jan11.154103.24261@bernina.ethz.ch> almesber@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch (Werner Almesberger) writes:
- >The main advantage of using anything more advanced than ASCII is print
- >quality and readability. Anybody who has ever read both the ASCII and the
- >LaTeX FAQ will surely agree.
-
- I don't have LaTex, so I cant tell.
-
- >Introductory documentation is typically written in ASCII. That the more
- >complete part is written in a decent format isn't a good excuse for not
- >reading the READMEs and FAQs :-)
-
- If you can't read it, you can't read it. I guess I'll just have to live
- with the 'introductory documentation' and just stumble along.
-
-
- --
- Jim, in the Land of the Lost. |Disclaimer: These are probably
- ObQuote: Do Not Meddle in the Affairs of | opinions. I'm probably not
- Wizards, For You are Crunchy, | supposed to have any.
- and Good with Ketchup. | Blessed Be!
-
-