home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!nic.umass.edu!news.amherst.edu!twpierce
- From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
- Subject: Re: Permanent status
- Message-ID: <C0H08w.Jr2@unix.amherst.edu>
- Organization: Elitist Usenet Administrators, Stuff and Nonsense Division
- References: <73H0QFC@math.fu-berlin.de> <79179@hydra.gatech.EDU> <FHJ0WDC@math.fu-berlin.de>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 06:19:43 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <FHJ0WDC@math.fu-berlin.de> guckes@math.fu-berlin.de (Sven Guckes) writes:
-
- >gs26@prism.gatech.EDU (Glenn R. Stone) writes:
- >
- >[Sven]
- >>>Why on earth would we want stati like "private" or "confidential" with email ?
- >>
- >>Ummm, it could be that sometimes you have folk looking over your shoulder
- >>or some such, and sometimes you don't?
- >
- >How about keeping people looking over your shoulder ? (hint hint)
-
- When you work in user support, this can be a rather tricky situation
- to engineer.
-
- --
- ____ Tim Pierce /
- \ / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu / Rocks say goodbye.
- \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /
-