home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.pascal
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!news.ccs.queensu.ca!slip201.telnet1.QueensU.CA!dmurdoch
- From: dmurdoch@mast.queensu.ca (Duncan Murdoch)
- Subject: Re: TVision : BUG in my head or in TV?
- Message-ID: <dmurdoch.297.726845641@mast.queensu.ca>
- Lines: 12
- Sender: news@knot.ccs.queensu.ca (Netnews control)
- Organization: Queen's University, Kingston
- References: <30DEC92.02825818.0033@music.mus.polymtl.ca> <dmurdoch.262.725736007@mast.queensu.ca> <30DEC92.14039571.0035@music.mus.polymtl.ca> <1993Jan4.203255.2366@ncsu.edu> <07JAN93.20698633.0034@music.mus.polymtl.ca> <pf-120193010406@biomac1d.bio.purduOrganization: Queen's University
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 13:34:02 GMT
-
- In article <pf-120193010406@biomac1d.bio.purdue.edu> pf@bilbo.bio.purdue.edu (Paul Furbacher) writes:
- >Duncan Murdoch mentioned
- >that he has confronted *annoyances* (not problems) over this
- >feature when porting TV objects to OWL.
-
- Just to clarify: they were both annoyances and problems; they were bugs.
-
- TV's TObject initializes all fields, OWL's TObject (same source code file
- now!) doesn't. This inconsistency is bad design. OWL is consistent with
- other parts of the language, TV isn't.
-
- Duncan Murdoch
-