home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.lang.c++:18994 comp.object:4758
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!glasgow!unix.brighton.ac.uk!je
- From: je@unix.brighton.ac.uk (John English)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.object
- Subject: Re: Pros and cons of C++
- Message-ID: <1993Jan12.095430.26044@unix.brighton.ac.uk>
- Date: 12 Jan 93 09:54:30 GMT
- References: <1993Jan11.204308.24171@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>
- Organization: University of Brighton, UK
- Lines: 17
-
- ccw@prefect.cc.bellcore.com (wood,christopher) writes:
- : ANSI function parameters, and parameter type checking are valuable.
- : And declarations within a block, not just at the beginning, and
- : assignment declarations (e.g. int count = 0;) are also an improvement
- : over plain C. And I like function name overloading and user-defined
- : operators.
-
- Umm... parameter type checking (i.e. function prototypes) are in ANSI C,
- and "assignment declaration" has always been in C.
- --
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- John English | Fudd's first law of opposition:
- Dept. of Computing | If you push something hard enough, it
- University of Brighton | *will* fall over.
- E-mail: je@unix.brighton.ac.uk | Testlicle's deviant to Fudd's law:
- Fax: 0273 642405 | What goes in, must come out.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-