home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!bnr.co.uk!uknet!glasgow!unix.brighton.ac.uk!wjmc
- From: wjmc@unix.brighton.ac.uk (-*_Cuddly_Cactus_*-)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Subject: Re: a ? b : c = d; /* legal ? */
- Message-ID: <1993Jan4.151000.10655@unix.brighton.ac.uk>
- Date: 4 Jan 93 15:10:00 GMT
- Organization: University of Brighton, UK
- Lines: 17
-
- pod@sour.sw.oz.au (Paul O'Donnell) writes:
- > In <BzDA4u.459@cdsmn.mn.org> wells@cdsmn.mn.org (Rich Wells) writes:
- >
- > [ Deleted (correct) discussion that a ? b : c = d; is equivalent to
- > (a ? b : c) = d; and is bogus. ]
- >
-
- Wandering off the thread of discussion a bit but surely the following is
- what was intended :
-
- * (a ? &b : &c) = d;
-
- :-)
- --
- # Bill Crawford aka *Cuddly_Cactus* BSc (Hons) Computer Science Year Two #
- # JANET wjmc@uk.ac.bton.{unix,vms} | Elsewhere wjmc@{unix,vms}.bton.ac.uk #
- # Any views I express are not necessarily those of Brighton Polytechnic #
-