home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!stanford.edu!unixhub!ditka!zygot!ravel!duncan
- From: duncan@ravel.ati.com (Jim Duncan)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: WB Fax Upgrade
- Message-ID: <91@ravel.ati.com>
- Date: 5 Jan 93 04:53:00 GMT
- References: <1993Jan2.204612.17857@netcom.com> <89@ravel.ati.com> <C0BDJI.3C9@news.rn.com>
- Reply-To: duncan@ravel.ati.com (Jim Duncan)
- Organization: K-FOX 94.5 Classic Rock (KUFX, Gilroy-San Jose, CA)
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <C0BDJI.3C9@news.rn.com> larry@news.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
- >duncan@ravel.ati.com (Jim Duncan) writes:
- >
- >Aren't you comparing a single user OS application against a multiuser
- >one which supports networking?
- >
- No. The "economy" $625 version is Faximum ELS, which features an
- "easy-to-use interface designed for non-technical users", custom cover
- sheets, WordPerfect integration, console display support, various font
- emulations "for laser quality faxes". That's it.
-
- "and for additional functionality there is Faximum PLUS"...
-
- Faximum PLUS is $900 and offers intelligent routing, multiple
- directories, detailed accounting, etc., etc. that make this the choice
- for networked systems.
-
- So a comparison between a single user (I assume) $290 Digifax package
- and the Faximum $625 product seems perfectly reasonable. I'm sure that
- Faximum makes wonderful software, but I believe it was an inappropriate
- and inconvenient recommendation from Telebit.
-
- --
- K-FOX| w ["] | WA6MBV
- 94.5 |... |___|_____..duncan@ravel.ati.com | Jim Duncan
- KUFX | H | 408.297.5977
- ******** \_____I_____/ 37 3 10N/121 59 10W **************
-