home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.archives.msdos.d:515 comp.compression:4595
- Path: sparky!uunet!auspex-gw!wally
- From: wally@Auspex.COM (Wally Bass)
- Newsgroups: comp.archives.msdos.d,comp.compression
- Subject: Re: $$ Is pkz204c worth the $$ ?
- Message-ID: <16353@auspex-gw.auspex.com>
- Date: 12 Jan 93 16:43:08 GMT
- References: <961@bbkingMDC.unisys.COM> <1993Jan12.052426.9168@uwasa.fi>
- Sender: news@auspex-gw.auspex.com
- Followup-To: comp.archives.msdos.d
- Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara
- Lines: 26
- Nntp-Posting-Host: auspex.auspex.com
-
- In article <1993Jan12.052426.9168@uwasa.fi> ts@uwasa.fi (Timo Salmi) writes:
-
- > ... PKZIP is the dominant current standard.
-
- The dominant standard, I think, is something that can be decompressed
- with pkunzip 1.10. If someone comes out with something which can't
- be decompressed by pkunzip 1.10, then it is no longer the dominant
- standard. Just because the files produced by this program have
- an extension of 'ZIP' (a disservice, it seems to me, since people
- will mistake these files for files which conform to the dominant
- standard decompression program, namely pkunzip 1.10) and comes from
- the infamous PKWARE software works doesn't mean a thing relative to
- the question of conforming to prevailing standards. pkzip 2.04c is
- fundamentally a new product having little relation to prevailing
- standards, and it should be viewed that way. Or perhaps it should
- be viewed somewhat more negatively, for absolutely destroying
- that 'standard' meaning that we previously could infer from the
- commonly used notion of 'zip file'.
-
- I would also point out that PKWARE has sold libraries for some time
- now, and that the 1.10 'standard' is built in to some number of
- commercial programs, such as Lotus Magellan. I'm not sure exactly
- how to think about these, but again, files with an extension
- of .ZIP which make these programs bomb don't seem like much
- of a service to anyone.
-
-