home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!ames!olivea!news.bbn.com!news.bbn.com!news
- From: celliott@BBN.COM (Chip Elliott)
- Newsgroups: comp.arch
- Subject: Turing & Big/Little Ends
- Message-ID: <lkr8t7INNh7j@news.bbn.com>
- Date: 8 Jan 93 15:54:15 GMT
- Reply-To: celliott@BBN.COM (Chip Elliott)
- Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
- Lines: 22
- NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com
-
-
- Despite some comments, numbers are not "universally" written
- big endian.
-
- Our favorite counter example, Alan Turing, would habitually
- write numbers left-to-write or vice versa, often in the course
- of the same talk. Thus when he wrote "21" on the board it might
- mean twenty-one or it might mean twelve.
-
- He thought endian-ness was a trivial detail and was surprised
- that anyone would be confused by his using whatever seemed
- more natural to the problem at hand.
-
- (And then there are the odd "five-and-twenty" constructions
- which I suppose happen in many languages. Vocal, yes, but they
- sometimes get written down this way.)
-
-
- ---
- Chip Elliott UUCP: {backbone}!bbn!celliott
- BBN Systems and Technologies INTERNET: celliott@bbn.com
- Cambridge, MA 02238
-