home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.arch
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!yale.edu!cs.yale.edu!!rabin
- From: rabin@CS.Yale.Edu (Dan Rabin)
- Subject: Re: big + little endian (was: Comparison of Alpha, MIPS ..)
- In-Reply-To: snail@lsl.co.uk's message of 6 Jan 93 17: 12:42 GMT
- Message-ID: <RABIN.93Jan7132015@nuthatch.CS.Yale.Edu>
- Sender: news@cs.yale.edu (Usenet News)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: nuthatch.systemsz.cs.yale.edu
- Reply-To: rabin-dan@cs.yale.edu
- Organization: Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-2158
- References: <1992Dec29.044012.1@cc.curtin.edu.au> <3623363@zl2tnm.gen.nz>
- <WAYNE.92Dec30093950@backbone.uucp>
- <markg.79.726169747@county.lmt.mn.org> <1993Jan6.171242.2895@lsl.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 13:20:15 GMT
- Lines: 13
-
- According to a book I have read that explains the Arabic alphabet,
- numerals in Arabic documents are written most-significant-digit
- leftmost, whereas the text itself is written from right to left.
- Hence the native reader encounters the least-significant digit first
- in his or her accustomed reading order. There's no reason to believe
- that Arabic-speaking arithmetic has suffered as a result.
-
- It's interesting to note that the digital notation passed through
- Arabic-speaking culture on its way from its Hindu origins to its
- adoption by Europeans. Since Sanskrit is written from left to right,
- this probably means that the perceived endian-ness has flipped twice.
-
- -- Dan Rabin (rabin-dan@cs.yale.edu)
-