home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.arch
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!news.funet.fi!hydra!klaava!veijalai
- From: veijalai@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Tony Veijalainen)
- Subject: FP-number cache? Unclocked VLSI design.
- Message-ID: <1993Jan5.085415.19676@klaava.Helsinki.FI>
- Organization: University of Helsinki
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 08:54:15 GMT
- Lines: 40
-
-
- This is my third posting in my cracy thoughts series :-)
-
- There is common trend towards harwardizing the memory lane by separating
- instructions and data to separate caches with own bus to other parts of
- CPU.
-
- On the other hand FPU-units that appear more and more are in modern big
- CPU:s are quite far conceptually from other operations. I have
- suspision that FP-arithmetic tends to cluster quite heavily, and because
- of traditional efficiency thinking and fixed number arithmetic in
- business applications some big parts of programs are integer only (not
- much FP-operations in interupt code for example :-).
-
- So have somebody researched the havoc FPU-instructions make to general
- data cache? Is there possible advantage of having FP-number (with
- separate bus to FPU-register file) and fixnumber caches with advantages
- outdoing the cost on CPU (like diminiching the general cache size, is
- this over specialization?).
-
- I am very inspired about Dick Pountains articles on ARM architecture in
- Dec 92 (ARM6) and Jan 93 (asyncronic ARM6) (Mayby it has something to do
- with the thing that I own ARM2 based ancient Acorn Archimedes A310 have
- something to do with it :-) Anyone of you real experienced experts care
- to comment on these especially the unclocked VLSI design. I can see
- some RISC -perspectives attacking the new wind mill: enormous clock
- circuitery in "More Risc Than Your Risc" Alpha processor. Jan 93 ibid
- article mentiones 1/4 of chip area cost of clock circuitery in current
- Alpha architecture implementation. Care to comment on architectual
- suitability of asyncronism instead of superpipelining in Alpha
- architecture. I do like Alpha very much thank you, but this one sided
- view of architectual development toward Cisc-scale complexity of
- pipeline magic and clocking instead of simple asyncronic circutery is
- mayby mistake, is it not?
-
-
- --
- Tony Veijalainen e-Mail: Tony.Veijalainen@helsinki.fi (preferred)
- (finger veijalai@plootu.helsinki.fi for more information)
-
-