home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UCLAMVS.BITNET!CSMIMAW
- Message-ID: <DECTEI-L%93010612154385@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dectei-l
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 09:13:00 PST
- Sender: DEC's The Education Initiative Discussion List
- <DECTEI-L@UBVM.BITNET>
- From: Mary Wright <CSMIMAW@UCLAMVS.BITNET>
- Subject: Value Chart
- Lines: 10
-
- The 12/22 email reminder and template for ESL/CSLG semi-annual reports includes
- 2 "value charts" to use to report actual and potential value of the Program.
- One list is dated January 1992-the other dated December1992. I am assuming we
- should use the value in the December 1992 chart (because of proximity of date)
- but I don't understand why two charts were distributed and fear that I am
- supposed to use both (six mos. at one value and six months at another) but that
- seems pretty silly. Thanks for a clearer vision!
-
- Mary Wright, wright@mic.ucla.edu
- UCLA Site License Software Coordinator
-