home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!FAC.ANU.EDU.AU!ANDALING
- Return-Path: <@VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU:andaling@durras.anu.edu.au>
- Message-ID: <9301060241.AA16170@fac.anu.edu.au>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.csg-l
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 13:41:52 EST
- Sender: "Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)" <CSG-L@UIUCVMD.BITNET>
- From: Avery Andrews <andaling@FAC.ANU.EDU.AU>
- Subject: other people's problems
- Lines: 19
-
- [Avery Andrews 930106.1341]
-
- Re Greg & Rick on solving other people's problems -- a possibly
- useful distinction that I've been mulling over is that between
- `macro-phenomena' and `micro-phenomena'. `Macro-phenomena' are
- the big, noticeable things that people start out wanting to understand.
- Such as our ability to use language to give and receive directions about
- how to go places, or to use our hands so as to get our breakfasts
- into our faces rather than on them. `Micro-phenomena' are the fiddly
- little details that experiments are directed at, which aren't
- intrinsically interesting to anybody, at least at first, but which
- tend to turn out crucial to getting real insight into the
- macro-phenomena.
-
- It seems to me that demonstrating utility for explaining macro-phenomena
- is an area where PCT can and should address `other people's problems'
- (and in fact does, in the Arm and Gatherings demos).
-
- Avery.Andrews@anu.edu.au
-