home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk:3879 news.admin.policy:1090 news.admin.misc:1010
- Newsgroups: alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk,news.admin.policy,news.admin.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!kadie
- From: kadie@eff.org (Carl M. Kadie)
- Subject: Re: Iowa State U. Code of Computer Ethics (was Re: Babak Sehari ...)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan7.220651.28781@eff.org>
- Originator: kadie@eff.org
- Sender: usenet@eff.org (NNTP News Poster)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eff.org
- Organization: The Electronic Frontier Foundation
- References: <C0Hnup.366@cs.uiuc.edu> <1993Jan7.155051.20843@eff.org> <1993Jan7.211206.27268@eff.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 22:06:51 GMT
- Lines: 62
-
- This is a critique of Iowa State University's Computer Ethics policy.
- Its due process protection is excellent. Its freedom of expression
- protection is not as good as it should be. Its privacy protection is
- unclear. It does not say how much users participated in policy
- creation. It has contains several items that seem redundant or that
- don't make sense. (This suggests a lack of review).
-
- Due process:
-
- It says: "Violations of the University Code of Computer Ethics are
- treated like any other ethical violation as outlined in the Student
- Handbook and applicable faculty and staff handbooks."
-
- I think this is a great way to tie the computer into general University
- procedures.
-
- Freedom of Expression:
-
- On the plus side it says: "ISU policies regarding the appropriate use
- of university facilities and the ethics of personal behavior apply to
- the use of all forms of electronic communication." It's great that
- computer communication is equated with other communication media. It's
- too bad that prohibitions are mentioned without mentioning rights. For
- example, most universities guarantee their community the right to be
- free of censorship.
-
- Also, the policy forbids the use of newsgroups, email, etc for
- "political purposes" without defining the term. The term is so vague
- that it could be used to ban much (most?) computer communications. The
- policy could be much improved by finding the specific Iowa State law
- that motivates this restriction and quoting it exactly. (The law
- likely forbids some specific partisan political uses.)
-
- Privacy: It says "Viewing or using another person's computer files,
- programs or data without authorized permission is unethical behavior
- and an invasion of that person's privacy." But it doesn't say
- explicitly if this applies to the University as well as to users. The
- policy could be improved by providing explicit privacy protection from
- all eyes, official and unofficial.
-
- Other items:
-
- It says: "Copyrighted software must only be used in accordance with
- its license or purchase agreement." This confuses copyrights with
- licenses. It should say: "Copyrighted software must be used in
- accordance with its copyright. Licensed software must be used in
- accordance with its license."
-
- Also, this item on copyright seems redundant given that the another
- long section of the policy also covers copyright.
-
- Finally, a nitpick. I think the policy could be improved by removing
- the word "ethics". To me, "ethics" is about things you don't have to
- do, but that you should do. This policy is about things you have to
- do; it is about about "rules", not "ethics". Unless Iowa State
- University has a tradition of calling its rules "ethics codes", I
- don't think it should apply the term here.
-
- - Carl
- --
- Carl Kadie -- I do not represent EFF; this is just me.
- =kadie@eff.org, kadie@cs.uiuc.edu =
-