home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / soc / women / 22045 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-03  |  1.3 KB
  1. Xref: sparky soc.women:22045 soc.men:22028 alt.feminism:6736 talk.abortion:53919
  2. Newsgroups: soc.women,soc.men,alt.feminism,talk.abortion
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!gatech!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!nigel.msen.com!heifetz!rotag!kevin
  4. From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
  5. Subject: Re: Parallel situations
  6. Message-ID: <1993Jan3.034934.11018@rotag.mi.org>
  7. Organization: Who, me???
  8. References: <1992Dec29.210320.9276@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <1993Jan1.015955.117@rotag.mi.org> <1993Jan02.044059.5171@watson.ibm.com>
  9. Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 03:49:34 GMT
  10. Lines: 16
  11.  
  12. In article <1993Jan02.044059.5171@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.IBM.com writes:
  13. >In <1993Jan1.015955.117@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
  14. >>
  15. >>What you contributed, Mark, while perhaps true, is irrelevant to the issue at
  16. >>hand.
  17. >
  18. >Actually, what Mark described is *exactly* what I've been talking about.
  19.  
  20. Then you have done an absymal job of expressing yourself, Larry. In
  21. <1992Dec28.182701.28515@watson.ibm.com>, you said "...there is no financial 
  22. obligation prior to birth." Mark Cochran, on the other hand, has said, in
  23. <1992Dec29.210320.9276@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, "...there most certainly *is* 
  24. formal billing of pregnancy costs before any child is born". If those two 
  25. statements are compatible, it's certainly not obvious HOW...
  26.  
  27.                                 - Kevin
  28.