home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.women:21888 soc.men:21772 alt.feminism:6519 talk.abortion:52879
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!gatech!concert!duke!gazit
- From: gazit@duke.cs.duke.edu (Hillel Gazit)
- Newsgroups: soc.women,soc.men,alt.feminism,talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: Parallel situations (was Re: Muffy becomes anti-choice)
- Message-ID: <725152160@lear.cs.duke.edu>
- Date: 23 Dec 92 23:09:21 GMT
- References: s3@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> <1992Dec23.162739.1@d0gslb.fnal.gov>
- Reply-To: gazit@cs.duke.edu (Hillel)
- Followup-To: soc.women
- Organization: Living In Harmony
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <1992Dec23.162739.1@d0gslb.fnal.gov>
- holzman@d0gslb.fnal.gov (Daniel B. Holzman) writes:
-
- >A parallell has been posted here several times. Here we go again:
-
- Don't waste time explaining anything to Adrienne.
- She *knows* that she is entitled for her rights, and that's that
- the only thing that should really count.
-
- >During the time that a woman can legally obtain an abortion, less lead
- >time for notification purposes, a man should be able to legally
- >disolve all ties to a fetus.
-
- I prefer to give him just one week, after he was notified, to decide
- if he wants rights and responsibilities toward the future child.
- The short time is important because abortions in the first weeks
- (vacuum methods, and (probably after 1/20/1993) RU-486), are safer,
- cheaper and easier.
-