home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.photo
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!ra!ra.nrl.navy.mil!tse
- From: tse@ra.nrl.navy.mil (Anthony Tse)
- Subject: Re: Canon 10s Vs Nikon N90, Which one?
- Message-ID: <BzznvG.72D@ra.nrl.navy.mil>
- Sender: usenet@ra.nrl.navy.mil
- Organization: Naval Research Lab, Washington, DC
- References: <1992Dec25.005852.20236@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> <1992Dec25.020841.22480@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> <1992Dec28.192848.1682@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 21:33:16 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <1992Dec28.192848.1682@porthos.cc.bellcore.com> ditch@prefect.cc.bellcore.com (ditch,r l) writes:
- >At the great risk of giving Alvin C. Shih an excuse to post another
- >100+ articles, I find that I can no longer sit back quietly while he
- >continues to make statements that don't agree with my own experiences.
- >[fantastic summry deleted..]
-
- Only want to add a couple of things and hopefully, this Nikon vs
- Canon thing will end.
-
- Any Canon users that claim they prefer non-compatible lens mount is
- lying. I would be a much happier person if I can use my FD lens on an
- EOS or vice-versa.
-
- Any Nikon users who claim Nikon can AF better then the EOS are lying.
-
- With that said and done, let's go out and take some pictures.
- Talking about creature features or reading in new program modes with
- a bar code reader is not going to make anyone a better photographer.
- If you can't do that, then go back to work.
-
- -Anthony
-
-