home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!uw-beaver!news.u.washington.edu!monaghan
- From: monaghan@cac.washington.edu (Tracy Monaghan )
- Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
- Subject: Re: Don't blame lawyers!
- Date: 28 Dec 1992 23:49:37 GMT
- Organization: UW Computing
- Lines: 24
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <1ho3qhINNmia@shelley.u.washington.edu>
- References: <1992Dec26.182617.643@uoft02.utoledo.edu> <1hn68aINNjag@life.ai.mit.edu> <1992Dec28.160923.691@uoft02.utoledo.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: red1.cac.washington.edu
-
- In article <1992Dec28.160923.691@uoft02.utoledo.edu> dcrosgr@uoft02.utoledo.edu writes:
- >In article <1hn68aINNjag@life.ai.mit.edu>, joltman@cookie-crisp.ai.mit.edu (T. Andy Frakes) writes:
- >> In article <1992Dec26.182617.643@uoft02.utoledo.edu>, dcrosgr@uoft02.utoledo.edu writes:
- >> |> While that may have been a tactic you used to while away the hours in your
- >> |> otherwise pointless existance, my posts have been designed to question the
- >> |> positions stated by 'experts' and if said positions are the result of informed,
- >> |> impartial decision-making.
- >>
- >> You seem to make a point of trying to pass yourself off as a well-educated
- >> scholar by using eloquent wording. This sentence fragment,
- >
- >That is no fragment. There is a subject (posts), verb (have been), and complete
- >thought.
- >
- [defensive postering deleted]
-
- None of this even remotely deals with chess.
-
- Out here in the 'wild' west, we have a saying, which seems appropriate at
- this juncture:
-
- DON'T FLOG DEAD HORSES!!!!
-
-
-