home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!charnel!rat!ucselx!crash!uzun
- From: uzun@crash.cts.com (Roger Uzun)
- Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
- Subject: Re: MChess Pro vs. ChessMachine
- Message-ID: <1992Dec27.231217.29616@crash>
- Date: 28 Dec 92 07:12:17 GMT
- References: <1992Dec26.192702.16955@crash> <2b3e4cfawnr070@ark.abg.sub.org>
- Organization: CTS Network Services (crash, ctsnet), El Cajon, CA
- Lines: 30
-
- In article <2b3e4cfawnr070@ark.abg.sub.org> ralf@ark.abg.sub.org (R.Stephan) writes:
- >> >
- >> But in Madrid, Chessmachine Schroeder defeated MChess Pro on a 486/66,
- >
- >
- > NOT!!!! Please check your facts.
- You are wrong, my FACTS are correct, Chessmachine and MChess Pro met
- head to head only once, and MChess Pro LOST. Please check the facts,
- I can send you a game listing if you like.
-
- > One CM win in one game is by no means a "defeat". Here you see 30 games.
- > And more coming...
-
- OK, perhaps the tourney can be declared invalid, but in fact MChess Pro
- and the chessmachine only met in 1 game, and in that game the result
- was decisive, The Chessmachine won the game outright. The fact
- is, if they had met 30 times, perhaps MChess pro would have won,
- but IN MADRID THEY ONLY MET ONCE, and MChess Pro LOST THE GAME.
- This may be inconclusive, I grant you, but....just declare the
- whole Madrid Chess tourney invalid and we will proceed from there.
- If you cannot declare the Madrid Chess tournament invalid, then
- you must accept the fact that The ChessMachine won the computer
- chess championship. I hear another tournament (for computers)
- is scheduled soon,perhaps that will allow MChess Pro a chance
- to redeem itself.
-
- -Roger
- --------------------------------------------------------------
- bix: ruzun
- NET: uzun@crash.cts.com
-