home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.boats
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ennews!mcdphx!dbk
- From: dbk@phx.mcd.mot.com (Dave Kinzer)
- Subject: Re: Celestial Navigation Question
- Message-ID: <1993Jan3.215750.9831@phx.mcd.mot.com>
- Summary: Accuracy?
- Keywords: Celestial
- Sender: dbk
- Nntp-Posting-Host: teroach.phx.mcd.mot.com
- Reply-To: teroach!dbk@phx.mcd.mot.com (Dave Kinzer)
- Organization: Motorola Analog Integrated Circuits Division
- References: <2B42109F.1700@ics.uci.edu> <1huu8tINNb01@cat.cis.Brown.EDU> <ZIELKE.92Dec31112338@hemlock.nrl.navy.mil>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 21:57:50 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- I read the post about getting sites to about 0.2 to 0.1 minute accuracy,
- but I'm not sure how this translates into actual accuracy of a fix. For
- example, by my admittedly un-expert calculations, any fix you could make
- will be traveling due west (or east depending on how you think about it)
- at better than 11 nautical miles a minute (This assumes a 45 degree or
- less latitude, in other words most waters in which we recreationally go
- boating.)
-
- I recall several months ago of one poster being thrilled to get a fix
- less than a mile from his actual position. Note: A fix. This doesn't
- mean average, root mean squared, three sigma accuracy, or any meaningful
- measure of how well this kind of navigation would keep you off a reef in
- the Bahamas.
-
- Anyone care to venture the average error of their last 20 fixes as
- compared to their GPS or LORAN location at the same time?
-
- Don't worry, no one will be able to judge your errors absolutely by this,
- since everyone who reads this newsgroup KNOWS how crummy GPS and LORAN
- positions are. 8^)
-
- -Dave
-
-