home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!gatech!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewsk!cbnewsj!ecl
- From: ecl@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (Evelyn C. Leeper)
- Subject: Homeschooling (was Re: Education and the Environment by Gregory A. Smith)
- Organization: AT&T
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 15:29:03 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Dec31.152903.25127@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>
- References: <C03JMs.Jy8@news.iastate.edu> <C040qL.4qM@watserv2.uwaterloo.ca> <scottj-311292082509@iamac-1.dml.georgetown.edu>
- Lines: 52
-
- In article <scottj-311292082509@iamac-1.dml.georgetown.edu> scottj@magic.dml.georgetown.edu (John L. Scott) writes:
- > Michael McDonald then wrote:
- >
- > > Thus far, the arguments proffered here in favor of homeschooling strike me
- > > as profoundly selfish, as primarily a matter of wanting to ensure that
- > > children are good little reflections of their parents. Talk about
- > > indoctrination!
- >
- > [Scott continues] In case that isn't enough: here is
- > my goal in homeschooling. I want my kids to have to the skills to learn
- > anything they want about the world, to pursue any interests they have, to
- > try to do anything they want to do. I want them to be able to think, to
- > have confidence in that ability and all their other abilities, and to have
- > respect for themselves and their own minds.
- >
- > They are free to do with all that what they will. If they decide to become
- > environmental activists, that's fine with me. If they decide to become
- > nuclear engineers and build nuclear power stations, that's fine too.
-
- I would agree with Michael McDonald, but for entirely different reasons
- than he puts forward. (Well, okay, I might say "shortsighted" rather
- than "profoundly selfish.")
-
- If one believes (as I do) that a society benefits by educating all its
- members, than for people to say, "Well, the school system is bad, so
- rather than work to fix it, I will pull my kids out." I certainly
- believe that parents should be concerned about their children's
- education, but it seems to me that this can be done in addition to
- sending them to public school, rather than in place of. If you take your
- children to museums, or talk about history, or do any number of things,
- you can add to the public school system, not replace it.
-
- Why is this important? Well, you may be committed to homeschooling
- your children. But what about the single parent who has to work
- full-time (or more) just to *support* his/her children? What about the
- parents who for whatever reason can't homeschool their children? Maybe
- they can't speak English very well. Maybe they are illiterate. Maybe
- they are handicapped. These children need a decent education, and
- abandoning the public school system and saying homeschooling is the
- answer seems to me to guarantee that the next generation will be even
- worse educated than the current one.
-
- And you say your children can become environmental activists or nuclear
- engineers. Can you homeschool them to do this? Do you have the
- science labs, the language labs, all the accoutrements that come with
- having a school that serves hundreds of students? Can they really
- pursue any interests they have, regardless of cost?
-
- Evelyn C. Leeper | +1 908 957 2070 | att!mtgzy!ecl or ecl@mtgzy.att.com
- --
- "God does not play dice with the universe." --Albert Einstein
- "Albert, stop telling God what to do." --Niels Bohr
-