home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!morrow.stanford.edu!oas!francis
- From: francis@oas.stanford.edu (Francis Muir)
- Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
- Subject: Chaucer. Was non-Rabelaisian farts
- Date: 28 Dec 1992 16:14:43 GMT
- Organization: Stanford Exploration Project
- Lines: 24
- Message-ID: <1hn95jINNf59@morrow.stanford.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: oas.stanford.edu
-
- Mike Godwin says to s1mbm:
-
- It is a source of pleasure to me that you know Chaucer, and
- I want to thank you again for sharing that with us.
-
- And to me a source of some pain that Godwin does not know Chaucer. The
- fact of the matter is that while an understanding of American literature
- might get by quite nicely without understanding Chaucer, that is not the
- case with English literature which, even up to the present day, is
- influenced more by Geoffrey Chaucer than any other writer not excluding
- William Shakespeare. The *The Miller's Tale* is much, much more than a
- tale of a fart, and *The Miller's Tale* is but a small part of *The
- Canterbury Tales*, which is astonishingly broad in its display of the
- human experience. The traditional way to start reading Chaucer is with
- *The Prologue to the Canterbury Tales*, and this is a fine way. I
- recommend the Bantam Classic paperback edition of the CT. It has the work
- in Old and New English on facing pages, and a useful Introduction, Glossary
- and Bibliography, all by Kent & Constance Hieatt. I paid $2.95 in 1990 for
- mine. Oh yes, and get the Caedmon recording I mentioned yesterday. Chaucer
- is not all sound and no sense, but there is a music to this English that
- MacLiammoir and Holloway bring out. After the Tales there is then for
- your pleasure *The Romaunt of the Rose* and *The Parliament of Fowls*.
-
- RABworm
-