home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!gatech!destroyer!news.iastate.edu!isuvax.iastate.edu!S1MBM
- From: s1mbm@isuvax.iastate.edu
- Subject: Re: *Any* kind of r.a.b split, or at least a *serious* discussion
- Message-ID: <Bzu2qq.Aor@news.iastate.edu>
- Sender: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System)
- Reply-To: s1mbm@isuvax.iastate.edu
- Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
- References: <1992Dec24.181422.19391@netcom.com> <1992Dec24.194250.11322@eff.org> <JMC.92Dec24163436@SAIL.Stanford.EDU>,<1992Dec25.091537.28480@nevada.edu>
- Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 21:08:49 GMT
- Lines: 92
-
- In article <1992Dec25.091537.28480@nevada.edu>, wwhitman@nevada.edu (MICHAEL WISE) writes:
- >In article <JMC.92Dec24163436@SAIL.Stanford.EDU> jmc@cs.Stanford.EDU writes:
- >>>
-
- >I thought I would just slide in right here. First, my exchanges with
- >Heather have not been, shall we say, pleasant. By e-mail and on the
- >net, I have been told to do many interesting things with parts of my body.
- >I did not intend to offend her with my reply to her post on Gertrude
- >Stein's AUTOBIOGRAPHY. I am a big proponent of Hemingway, right or wrong,
- >and others on the net have seen me defend him vociferously against mostly
- >feminist attacks >my posts on the net have been positive. I never meant to call her a dyke;
- >as she was the author of the post, I suppose she took my reference to
- >dykes elevating Stein at the expense of Hemingway to mean her. Her vit-
- >roil caused me to go back and re-read the AUTOBIOGRAPHY and Jeffrey
- >Meyers biography of Hemingway (thus explaining my relative silence).
- >I don't feel I was in error when I characterized Stein as a fat, lazy
- >lesbian with a serious grudge against the more successful Hemingway.
- >He was her pupil, but he also did a great deal for her, especially
- >to help her get her work published (The Making of Americans appeared
- >serially in the Transatlantic Review while Ford Madox Ford was in
- >America and Hemingway was at the helm). Her experiments in style were
- >unsuccessful, mostly because, as Hemingway put it, she was too lazy to
- >re-write anything and make it understandable for the reader. Hemingway,
- >for all his faults, worked hard to develop his craft, rising early to
- >write and revise, and Stein's eminence in his eyes was diminished by
- >her failure to do so. That she was fat, that she was a lesbian, is hardly
- >in dispute; that she lived on her father's money is easy to determine;
- >that she failed as a great Cubist art critic is supported by Braque's
- >comments that she hadn't the faintest what they were trying to do.
- >
- >I consider these to be facts, and on a literary subject. I fear that
- >I don't get much chance to read *new* books and provide the r.a.b. with
- >my opinions of them; however, I believe books are about ideas. Ideas
- >come to centerstage here, and the discussion rightly centers on the ideas
- >rather than the text of the book. Books are good sources of discussions
- >about all kinds of issues, and people who love to read also love, not just
- >to ingest books, but to discuss the issues raised by them.
- >
- >I am not above trading insults with Heather; I just don't think it will
- >go anywhere. She has been villified, and accordingly she has become a
- >martyr, a martyr for a cause that Mark (if he were not so sadly embroiled
- >in and so tired of it) would have written a finer parody of than the MERRY
- >SPINSTERS OF R.A.B could ever hope to be. The cause to return this group
- >to an idyllic past where everyone just talked about books, with the
- >corollary that people who sit on the sidelines would contribute to their
- >heart's content without fear of biting satire or reprisal, is contrary
- >to the very heart of this newsgroup. This newsgroup is not about books,
- >but the ideas that come out of books; naturally it is open-ended, and
- >it often goes too far. But where do you draw the line? On the other
- >point, I like the constant probing of my ideas (and of my grammar) be-
- >cause it makes me think about what I say (and how I say it). Some of it
- >is inconsequential, some of it is substantial. However, it is interesting
- >to see how people react to you. I don't see this as a public forum; I
- >would never make some of the statements I make if I were actually in a
- >room with you people, because I would want you to like me. Here, I don't
- >have to live with you, work with you, sleep with you, pass pleasant moments
- >with you; if you don't like me, I can just turn off the computer, refuse
- >to answer your e-mail, decline to defend my posts. I communicate differ-
- >ently here; but I'm sure that some of you know me better than my closest
- >friends, because here I can be truly honest. Scathingly honest. And I
- >fully expect your reactions to be as honest. I would hate to think some-
- >one was holding something back, when they have nothing to lose by being
- >straight with me.
- >
- >I do not fault Heather for being straight with me. I fault her for wanting
- >me to change my opinions so that they would be germane with hers. I can
- >and have done that in conversations to save the conversation from becoming
- >unpleasant. However, it is not honest, and it is not right.
- >
- >___________________________________________________________________________
- >Michael Wise (wwhitman@nevada.edu) UNLV English
- >
- >"Now I want you to tell me just one thing more. Why do you hate the South?"
- >"I dont hate it," Quentin said quickly, at once, immediately; "I dont
- >hate it," he said. I dont hate it he thought, panting in the cold air,
- >the iron New England dark: I dont. I dont. I dont hate it! I dont hate it!
- > --William Faulkner, Absalom! Absalom!
- >
- >
- >
-
- Give me a break. To use value-laden words like "fat", "lazy" and "lesbian"
- together while claiming to be merely descriptive is the height of
- disingenuousness. Have you taken a look at your library's holdings of
- Stein's work? To say that a person who produced such a substantial body
- of *work* was lazy insults us all. You should be so lazy! Also, I find it
- interesting how you begin by complaining about feminists attacking
- Hemingway, only to narrow your complaint against a "fat, lazy lesbian."
- Nice move, bub. Maybe you think it's cute to make such gestures of
- tacit conflation; I find it merely crude.
-
- michael mcdonald
-