home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!lynx!cyclops.eece.unm.edu!rsquires
- From: rsquires@cyclops.eece.unm.edu (Roger Squires)
- Subject: Re: Call For Discussion: rec.arts.books.reviewed
- Message-ID: <y4gr=yf@lynx.unm.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 92 05:28:51 GMT
- Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
- References: <sph0301.122.724692333@utsph.sph.uth.tmc.edu> <1992Dec18.171313.21177@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> <1992Dec23.034749.23220@athena.mit.edu>
- Lines: 34
-
- > kamorgan@athena.mit.edu (Keith Morgan) writes:
- > . . .. Paul, you seem to be chastising Francis
- >for his promotion of a judicious use of "n", "k", and "K". I don't see
- >what's the matter with that in the first place.
-
- I have a very nice article dated 11/25 by the Director of
- Project Gutenberg with the title:
- "Response to those who complain about having to use the delete key"
- which elaborates on Mr. Morgan's sentiment.
- If anyone wants a copy, just ask me.
-
- >. . . enough discussion, put out a RFD, let's put it to a
- >vote . . .
- >
-
- Agree, though I would support a rec.arts.books.reviews,
- and scrap alt.books.reviews (I do not receive this last
- anyway, for some reason). This would at the least be
- bread and circuses, and at the most could develop into
- a Good Thing. Xposting I do not believe would be a
- problem, since all someone posting a review to both groups
- needs to do is set the followups here. Very natural.
- This group would be unmoderated.
-
- And I see that Ms. Henderson has once again voiced her
- distaste for the 'oligarchic' nature of rab. I was going
- to post a response to the effect that rab is not modeled
- on Republican Rome, and a campaign by some Gracchian
- pretender for Tribune of the People is lost before it ever
- was started. But I won't. :)
-
- >Keith
-
- rms
-