home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky news.groups:24995 soc.motss:54498
- Newsgroups: news.groups,soc.motss
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!panix!mara
- From: mara@panix.com (Mara Chibnik)
- Subject: Re: Soc.Motss.* (was Re: new newsgroup proposal:talk.politics.motss)
- Message-ID: <C06HIL.Kt5@panix.com>
- Organization: (getting there)
- References: <BzF7os.Ap4@agora.rain.com> <1htn8aINN7qr@plts.uucp> <1992Dec31.061336.26874@ads.com> <1992Dec31.174100.23841@spdcc.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 13:59:09 GMT
- Lines: 26
-
-
-
- henry@ADS.COM (Henry Mensch) writes:
- >>why not soc.motss.classic ... in fact, why not just two groups:
- >>soc.motss.classic (for we, the merry cabalistas) and
- >>soc.motss.lusing-turistik-skum (for everyone else) ...
- rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue) writes:
- > "we"?????
- > Hmmm... maybe soc.motss.wewhothinkweareinthecabal.... ???
- > (I won't say which of us this applies to... maybe both?)
-
- How about soc.motss.cabal and soc.motss.noncabal? If there was
- sufficient agitation, soc.motss.anticabal could also happen.
-
- I'd be really interested to see who'd prefer to post to
- soc.motss.cabal and who'd go to soc.motss.noncabal.
-
- Of course, I probably wouldn't then go around telling people (with
- stars in my keys) that *there* *is* *no* *cabal*. I guess that
- might make some people happy.
-
- --
-
- Mara Chibnik
- mara@panix.com Life is too important to be taken seriously.
-
-