home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!kaminski
- From: kaminski@netcom.com (Peter Kaminski)
- Subject: Re: homeopathy
- Message-ID: <1993Jan3.201728.4425@netcom.com>
- Organization: The Information Deli - via Netcom / San Jose, California
- References: <sandrock.725640765@aries> <1hps9bINNdc6@rave.larc.nasa.gov> <1992Dec29.183006.1832@netcom.com> <1hssu9INNgpt@rave.larc.nasa.gov>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 20:17:28 GMT
- Lines: 35
-
- In article <1hssu9INNgpt@rave.larc.nasa.gov> kludge@grissom.larc.nasa.gov
- (Scott Dorsey) writes:
-
- >That's true, and without accurate double-blind testing, you don't really
- >have much empirical evidence.
-
- No, you *do* have empirical evidence (by definition), you just don't have
- bias from possible placebo effects removed. And without a control group,
- you wouldn't have bias from other factors removed, either.
-
- >This is a real problem with human beings, since we are such complex
- >organisms and there are so many possible influences.
-
- It's a problem in clinical tests, wherein the goal is to control each
- variable except the one being tested.
-
- But in homeopathic prescribing, it's not really a problem. The homeopath
- just notes the value of a whole bunch of variables and finds the remedy
- that's been empirically noted to be effective for that particular symptom
- picture.
-
- >After looking at how much testing the FDA does, how extensive
- >it is, and how lousy a job they do, it's obvious that testing anything on
- >humans with any amount of rigor is not an easy task.
-
- Yup. Reductionism tends to create lots of little details to take care of.
-
- >Someone else pointed out that a lot of medications used by allopathic
- >physicians also had no known mode of action. Those make me nervous also.
-
- At least there's generally a physically understood basis for *some*
- sort of biological activity. :) It is nice to have confidence about
- what sort of activity it will be, though.
-
- Pete
-