home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!claris!outpost.SF-Bay.org!peirce
- From: peirce@outpost.SF-Bay.org (Michael Peirce)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
- Subject: RE: Apple 16-inch vs. Sony CPD1604S???
- Message-ID: <D2150035.mm7dls@outpost.SF-Bay.org>
- Date: 2 Jan 93 18:23:49 GMT
- Reply-To: peirce@outpost.SF-Bay.org (Michael Peirce)
- Organization: Peirce Software
- Lines: 25
- X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1
-
-
- In article <725875219.AA06686@blkcat.UUCP> (comp.sys.mac.hardware), Mitch.Alland@p956.f70.n109.z1.fidonet.org (Mitch Alland) writes:
- > Monte Olsen writes in a message to All on 31 Dec 92:
- >
- > MO> Does anyone have any other information about this or which
- > MO> monitor is best?
- >
- > I saw both in a store and found the Sony "fuzzier" than either the Apple or
- > the NEC 5FG. This is not how MacUser rated the Sony in the January issue --
- > they rated it better than the NEC.
- >
- > If you want multiple resolutions then I'd go with the NEC, otherwise the Apple
- > One thing that I don't like about the NEC is that it doesn't have a
- > switchable power supply, so you need a transformer if you ever need to take it
- > to a country with 220v current, but that may not be a consideration for you.
-
- The reason I bought a Sony was that I thought the NEC as too fuzzy.
-
- I wouldn't be surprises to see some variation among individual picture
- tubes.
-
- -- Michael Peirce -- peirce@outpost.SF-Bay.org
- -- Peirce Software -- Suite 301, 719 Hibiscus Place
- -- -- San Jose, California USA 95117
- -- Drop by booth #4463 -- voice: (408) 244-6554 fax: (408) 244-6882
- -- at MacWorld Expo/SF -- AppleLink: peirce & America Online: AFC Peirce
-