home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!emory!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!hemi!jerry
- From: jerry@msi.com (Jerry Shekhel)
- Subject: Re: Future Amiga chipsets
- References: <1992Dec23.225039.19598@oracle.us.oracle.com>
- Sender: nobody@ctr.columbia.edu
- Organization: Molecular Simulations, Inc.
- Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 19:39:40 GMT
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
- Message-ID: <1992Dec26.193940.13216@sol.ctr.columbia.edu>
- X-Posted-From: hemi.msi.com
- NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu
- Lines: 171
-
- David Navas (dnavas@oracle.uucp) wrote:
- :
- : >Really? Well, in *my* universe the average hard drive isn't capable of
- : >more than, say, 1.5-2MB/sec, which ISA can easily deal with, with plenty of
- : >room to spare. What about your universe?
- :
- : In my (ideal) universe, a bus would be doing a lot more than running a
- : (single, even) harddrive.
- :
-
- OK, but since we don't live in your (ideal) universe, what's the point?
-
- :
- : I claim that my universe would be a lot more fun to live in than yours.
- :
-
- I can think of a million "more fun" universes. Your point? (Why is this
- turning into a discussion about metaphysics?)
-
- :
- : Let me ask this question more explicitly -- Is something not useful because
- : it's not normal?
- :
-
- Of course not, i.e., it may well be useful. It is not useful, however, if it
- ends up sitting around unused.
-
- :
- : Are there not current peripherals that can NOT be
- : hooked up to a regular ISA bus because of ISA's lack of bandwidth? Would
- : you NOT find these peripherals attractive?
- :
-
- For example, a 32-bit bus-mastering SCSI controller? I would find it useful
- if, for example, I had to support many users. I don't, and 99.9% of
- computer buyers don't either.
-
- :
- : >What good is a 550 GB/s bus if all your peripherals being cranked at once
- : >don't add up to 5MB/s?
- :
- : Because people would start making peripherals that could use the bus?
- :
- : Are you really missing the chicken-and-egg scenario you are proposing as a
- : "defense"?
- :
-
- Hmm... That's a good point. I have to agree.
-
- :
- : Thirdly, laugh all you want, but try and get a job with any decent workstation
- : company by telling them you have an in-depth knowledge of Intuition gadget
- : construction on the Amiga, or fixing ISA-bus conflicts on the PC. Watch as
- : you get laughed out of your interview.
- :
-
- Is it me, or do you actually believe that these "decent workstation" companies
- somehow have more of a right to exist, or are somehow more "serious", than
- "personal computer" companies"?
-
- :
- : Sorry, maybe you missed it. The point was that without someone else
- : actually driving innovation into our beloved PCs, we'd have been in even
- : worse shape. Again, the driving force for change in the PC industry does
- : not come FROM the PC industry. This is dangerous.
- :
-
- Really? Where does it come from?
-
- :
- : What, a more vivid representation of the real world?
- : How does that, in your words "help you now"? I agree, this is a great thing
- : to have, but it is inconsistent to your "useful for human beings *today*".
- :
-
- Absolutely false. I can make use of the 24-bit graphics card *today*, thanks
- to DIG.
-
- :
- : The whole idea of a 66Mhz 486 is inconsistent to the same. That doesn't
- : make it a bad thing -- far from it. It is merely inconsistent to praise
- : the progress in one area and attempt to defend that lack of same in
- : other areas.
- :
-
- Why is it inconsistent? Effort is going into progress that benefits the user
- in the most dramatic way, and I'm talking about *lots* of effort. Yet you
- look at one part of the system that hasn't changed in a long time (although
- alternatives do exist), and call the whole thing "crippled".
-
- Do you at least agree that I would be equally justified in calling the Amiga
- "crippled"?
-
- :
- : Computers are tools when you tell me what it is I can do with them.
- : Until then, they are a way for me to make a living.
- :
-
- You can make a living off them. Obviously they are used by *somebody*
- as tools.
-
- :
- : Sure, because you have a use for a screwdriver or a drill. I have not found
- : an application that "Joe Consumer" has any use for (above and beyond something
- : like a Sega Genesis).
- :
-
- Maybe that's because these applications don't exist for the Amiga? On my PC,
- I use an application called "Quicken" to manage my finances, and to me, the
- convenience was easily worth the price of the PC. Of course, I also use my
- PC for other things, but those could not really be classified as everyday
- uses.
-
- Also, why are we always talking about "Joe Consumer"? What about people who
- use computers in business?
-
- :
- : That's probably why more people own screwdrivers and hammers than computers.
- :
-
- That's also why more people own PC's than Amigas.
-
- :
- : On a little more serious plane, think about this for a minute. Our
- : intelligence is a direct result of the number of CONNECTIONS between our
- : neurons, and NOT the power of our neurons in and of themselves. Seems to
- : me that 100million PCs with a really wicked-fast connection architecture
- : could do some almost "interesting" things, like a REAL version of AI.
- :
- : And that, folks, is a whole lot more interesting than real-time image
- : manipulation which is going to be driving a multi-billion dollar industry
- : under the rather dubious title of "multimedia".
- :
-
- Yes, but is it useful for something?
-
- :
- : So, just what DO you do with your PC, then. I mean, besides work?
- :
-
- I develop software as a hobby, I use the PC for word processing, I experiment
- with music composition, and I manage my finances. BTW, why are you excluding
- work-related applications again?
-
- :
- : Tell me why 100million people need one?
- :
-
- Obviously, for thousands of different applications, including business uses.
-
- :
- : Yes, I was taking the reverse argument "that PCs are useful" and then showing
- : how that's incredibly silly. PCs are NOT useful. They WILL be someday.
- : Until that day, technology drives technology, not some unrealistic version
- : of the universe where even "word processors" are somehow useful....
- : [And they are, no doubt about it, but are they worth several thousand
- : dollars in software and hardware useful?]
- :
-
- Whoa! Where did you ever get this attitude? Anyone else think that computers
- are totally useless?
-
- :
- : David C. Navas
- :
- --
- +-------------------+----------------------------+---------------------------+
- | JERRY J. SHEKHEL | Molecular Simulations Inc. | Time just fades the pages |
- | Drummers do it... | Burlington, MA USA | in my book of memories. |
- | ... In rhythm! | jerry@msi.com | -- Guns N' Roses |
- +-------------------+----------------------------+---------------------------+
-