home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!news.cs.indiana.edu!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!ecn.purdue.edu!helz
- From: helz@ecn.purdue.edu (Randall A Helzerman)
- Subject: Re: FCC will proclaim Microsoft is run by Communists! :)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan2.041302.24465@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>
- Sender: news@noose.ecn.purdue.edu (USENET news)
- Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
- References: <1992Dec21.225330.14706@nosc.mil> <9212213006@ritz.mordor.com> <1992Dec22.120639.23608@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> <1993Jan2.003855.26051@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 04:13:02 GMT
- Lines: 14
-
- In article <1993Jan2.003855.26051@midway.uchicago.edu>, sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples) writes:
- |> In article <1992Dec22.120639.23608@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> helz@ecn.purdue.edu (Randall A Helzerman) writes:
- |> >AT&T was only a monopoly because it was illegal to compete with it. In fact,
- |> >I can't name a single example of a monopoly which wasn't created by
- |> >the goverment.
- |>
- |> A quick look at anti-trust case history reveals several examples.
- |> Without arguing the individual merits of each case, how about Standard
- |> Oil or U.S. Steel?
-
- We've already established that these weren't really monopolies but in a quick
- review in 1911 when Standard Oil was broken up it controlled only 66% of
- the market, and had been losing Market share for almost 20 years because of
- stiff competition from Texico and Gulf.
-