home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!itsmail1.hamilton.edu!jmalloy
- From: jmalloy@itsmail1.hamilton.edu (Joseph T. Malloy)
- Subject: Re: More advertising
- Message-ID: <1992Dec31.223620.8034@itsmail1.hamilton.edu>
- Organization: Hamilton College - Clinton, NY
- References: <1992Dec30.181522.5719@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <1992Dec31.041533.3989@microsoft.com> <BUHR.92Dec31131124@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 22:36:20 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <BUHR.92Dec31131124@ccu.umanitoba.ca> buhr@umanitoba.ca (Kevin Andrew Buhr) writes:
- >In article <1992Dec31.041533.3989@microsoft.com>
- >philipla@microsoft.com (Phil Lafornara) writes:
- >|
- >| Fred, if you can show me an MS-DOS ad that says that it
- >| runs "all DOS programs", or a Windows ad that says it "runs all
- >| Windows programs", then I'll lobby to have the company change
- >| it. I have never seen such an ad - I don't honestly believe
- >| that one exists.
- >
- >Tell you what, Phil. If you can get Microsoft to pull the "operating
- >system" crap from their Windows boxes, I'll help you lobby against
- >using the word "all" in OS/2 advertising.
- >
- >Kevin <buhr@ccu.UManitoba.CA>
-
- Why? It *is* an operating system.
-
- gd&r, as they say on Compu$erve...
-
- jmalloy@hamilton.edue
-
-