home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!lib!oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu!jmaynard
- From: jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Subject: Re: FCC will proclaim Microsoft is run by Communists! :)
- Message-ID: <8244@lib.tmc.edu>
- Date: 30 Dec 1992 17:20:49 GMT
- References: <1992Dec29.205556.10155@microsoft.com> <8239@lib.tmc.edu> <1992Dec30.162838.9739@tc.cornell.edu>
- Sender: usenet@lib.tmc.edu
- Organization: UT Health Science Center Houston
- Lines: 14
- Nntp-Posting-Host: oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu
-
- In article <1992Dec30.162838.9739@tc.cornell.edu> bai@msiadmin.cit.cornell.edu (Dov Bai-MSI Visitor) writes:
- >From the above I conclude that you think that force is a bad thing.
- >After a zillion of postings claiming that there is nothing wrong
- >with force, and therefore everything is fine with the FTC forcing
- >MS to change its marketing, I becoming a little confused.
-
- It's OK for the FTC to force MS to change its marketing because this is force
- in response to force...our net.libertarians will universally agree that the
- initiation of force is wrong, but using force in response to someone else's
- first use of force is good and necessary. MS initiated the use of force.
- --
- Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL | Never ascribe to malice that which can
- jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu | adequately be explained by stupidity.
- "Brought to you by the letters O, S, and by the number 2." -- Mike Levis
-