home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!crdgw1!rpi!batcomputer!msiadmin.cit.cornell.edu!bai
- From: bai@msiadmin.cit.cornell.edu (Dov Bai-MSI Visitor)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Subject: Re: FCC will proclaim Microsoft is run by Communists! :)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec30.162838.9739@tc.cornell.edu>
- Date: 30 Dec 92 16:28:38 GMT
- References: <8194@lib.tmc.edu> <1992Dec29.205556.10155@microsoft.com> <8239@lib.tmc.edu>
- Sender: news@tc.cornell.edu
- Organization: /usr/local/lib/news/organization
- Lines: 17
- Nntp-Posting-Host: msiadmin.cit.cornell.edu
-
- In article <8239@lib.tmc.edu> jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard) writes:
- >They are straight. The difference in cost, if it is anywhere near as
- >substantial as others on this group have led me to believe, _is_ force. If
- >you're going to charge me more money for the privilege of not bundling DOS and
- >Windows with every machine I sell, then you're forcing me to do so. This is
- >predatory pricing at its worst.
-
- From the above I conclude that you think that force is a bad thing.
- After a zillion of postings claiming that there is nothing wrong
- with force, and therefore everything is fine with the FTC forcing
- MS to change its marketing, I becoming a little confused.
-
- >Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL | Never ascribe to malice that which can
- >jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu | adequately be explained by stupidity.
- > "Brought to you by the letters O, S, and by the number 2." -- Mike Levis
-
- Dov
-