home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / comp / os / os2 / advocacy / 11073 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-12-29  |  1.2 KB
  1. Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.advocacy:11073 comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy:3499
  2. Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!moose.cccs.umn.edu!rwh
  4. From: rwh@moose.cccs.umn.edu (RICHARD HOFFBECK)
  5. Subject: Re: FCC will proclaim Microsoft is run by Communists! : )
  6. Message-ID: <29DEC199210143369@moose.cccs.umn.edu>
  7. News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
  8. Sender: news@news2.cis.umn.edu (Usenet News Administration)
  9. Nntp-Posting-Host: moose.cccs.umn.edu
  10. Reply-To: rwh@moose.cccs.umn.edu
  11. Organization: Colon Cancer Control Study, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
  12. References: <1992Dec22.201103.28693@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> <1992Dec22.234828.0203999@locus.com> <1992Dec28.201454.20862@microsoft.com> <1992Dec28.235054.0201318@locus.com>
  13. Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 16:14:00 GMT
  14. Lines: 10
  15.  
  16. In article <1992Dec28.235054.0201318@locus.com>, lowell@locus.com (Lowell Morrison) writes:
  17. > For this reason, I feel that if these reports are true (and I know that
  18. > Windows 3.1 violates the DPMI standards promilgated by MS from other
  19. > reliable sources), I can indeed blame MS.  
  20.  
  21. My impression was that the problem is that Windows doesn't impliment the entire
  22. DPMI standard, not that it doesn't conform to the standard.
  23.  
  24. --rick
  25.  
  26.