home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!linac!unixhub!slacvm!streater
- Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
- Date: Monday, 28 Dec 1992 17:24:33 PST
- From: Tim Streater (415) 926-2743 <STREATER@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>
- Message-ID: <92363.172433STREATER@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
- Subject: Dec and IEEE Spanning Tree differences
- Lines: 26
-
- I am trying to understand spanning tree a little better, particularly as we
- have Cisco routers doing bridging, and bridges from DEC (LANBridge 150) and
- NAT (LAN100M).
-
- As I understand it there are two spanning tree algorithms, so-called DEC and
- IEEE. Bridges implementing these protocols exchange multicast packets between
- themselves in order to decide who should go into backup mode, in the case where
- bridges are connected redundantly in loops.
-
- In Radia Perlman's book "Interconnections" she mentions that there is a special
- multicast address assigned to "all bridges", but does not then say what the
- address is.
-
- I would like to know:
-
- 1) What this multicast address is and are there two of them, one for the DEC
- and one for the IEEE protocols?
-
- 2) Radia Perlman also describes the format of the multicast packets. Are there
- any differences here between the two algorithms?
-
- We plan to have the Cisco routers running the DEC protocol and the bridges
- running IEEE, with no mixture of bridge vendors on a given subnet. Is this a
- sensible scheme?
-
- Thanks - Tim Streater / SLAC Network Development.
-